Comments: I'm thinking of a different sort of punishment

Hmmm... my usual vote for crime quite this despicable is that they should be shot. A bit at a time.

Posted by Andy Cunningham at July 19, 2007 07:42 AM

IRA six pack, perhaps?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=IRA+six+pack

At the very least, they should have to pay the $30,000.

Seriously the only way to teach people like this a lesson is to hurt them or take their money.

Posted by Harvey at July 20, 2007 08:11 AM

Money is fine, but I'd opt for mind-bending pain. Sure, that makes me a dick, but I'm okay with that.

Posted by physics geek at July 20, 2007 04:18 PM

I'm okay with the judge giving them the whole three years.

However, given that a judge just sentenced a woman to less than three years for blowing away her husband with a shotgun blast to his back, I think it would be hard to argue that three years for these girls isn't enough.

I'm just sayin'.

Posted by Kent at July 21, 2007 10:41 AM

Yes, i agree that when ever an animal or human is tortured or harmed in any way by another being, that person should be changed with a crime, imprisioned and forced to pay for the medical care- no matter how long it takes. Wage executions are done for various reasons so this should also be included. Maybe then, these heartless criminals may think twice. All life has value!

Posted by Diane at August 1, 2007 11:43 PM