Comments: Reason #2394858 as to Why We Don't Have a Dog

But, to a doggie it smelled so good. At least it was not soft and gooshie so the dog would roll in it.

Posted by jon spencer at November 28, 2009 11:33 PM

Oh that would have been nasty. Bones said to me, "Mom, there was all sorts of crap stuck to that roadkill... grass, dirt, junk." And that dog was going to get in their car? Gah!

Posted by Bou at November 28, 2009 11:44 PM

The nastier it smells, the more dogs are gonna think they struck gold.

Lance and Maggie both love to roll in nasty smelling stuff, blech.

And as for eating, they will eat anything outside. Maggie has an taste for other dogs poop and they both think worm jerky is a delicacey.

Posted by Quality Weenie at November 29, 2009 09:09 AM

Can I just say EEEEWWWWWW!!! I'll stick with our cats, thank you very much!

Posted by Lemon Stand at November 29, 2009 07:07 PM

We know for a fact that dogs have much better senses of smell than humans. So doesn't it logically follow that we're the ones who are missing something when we don't do these sorts of things? By the way, for a long time my nickname for my buddy's westhighland terrier was "copraphagia". Now she isn't so open with that habit so I let her lick my face.

Posted by Carl Brannen at November 29, 2009 07:22 PM

Carl- NO! She may not be so open with it, but you don't know she still doesn't do it! GAH! I'm going to barf!

Posted by Bou at November 29, 2009 08:05 PM

Bou, I guess I won't mention then that I still drink out of my water glass after Lance or Maggie still a lick out of it.

Why waste a full glass of whatever just because the puppers dipped their tounge in it?!

Posted by Quality Weenie at November 30, 2009 10:22 AM

I dunno about the cats either, Bou. One of our cats is a puke eater ... any puke, any source - he doesn't care!

Posted by PeggyU at December 1, 2009 03:53 AM