Comments: Possibly the most ridiculous rationale by a liberal pundit backing up the Obama administration

(We reserve the right to edit and/or delete any comments. If your comment is blocked or won't post, e-mail us and we'll post it for you.)

If Colmes had made the case that "radical Islam" is linguistic garbage, then he'd have a point. "Radical" doesn't mean anything in this context other than as a signal word for people we are allowed to dislike. It's a buzzword like "NeoCon" or "Fundamentalist." Very few of those words actually mean anything specific other than "hey it's politically correct to still have a hate on for these guys."

The sad truth though, is that these people aren't radical or extremists within their own cultures. They're pretty run of the mill Muslims. Perhaps a bit more devout than the general population, but otherwise normal folks. Muslims still have concepts that the secular west has largely discarded. When was the last time you heard a Christian talk about Christendom in the present tense? However a similar Muslim concept of Islam was the motivator of the Times Square Bomber.

Posted by Jeff the Baptist at May 20, 2010 01:42 PM

Post a comment

Remember personal info?