Comments: Security guard testimony: MJ gave oral sex to underaged boy in '93

I don't know if everything that is said about Michael is true, but one thing for sure, he was really not smart(putting it nicely) for putting himself in this position again. If he got off once, why would he put himself in this position again? Why?????

Posted by Cynthia at April 7, 2005 05:39 PM

Tell me please, why wait years before speaking up that you saw this kind of act?

Some people besides Jacko belong in jail: the kids' parents who let them go over Jacko's house and sleep in the man's room, and people who saw things but didn't notify the police.

Posted by DarkStar at April 7, 2005 06:00 PM

Dark Star,

You do have a point here.

Posted by Cynthia at April 7, 2005 06:20 PM

DS - You DO have a point. The remainder of the CNN article (as well as the LA Times piece I saw earlier) I linked to here points out that Meserau's cross brought up the fact that the guard was part of a class-action suit brought about by disgruntled former employees of Jackson's. Beyond that, the only reason that I could see him not coming forward before now was the settlement of the 1993 accusations.

I'm certain there has to be more evidence from the prior cases that Sneddon plans to bring up - if this is it, the question marks will remain.

Posted by mhking at April 7, 2005 11:12 PM
Post a comment

Remember personal info?